Thursday, October 27, 2005

My Grandpa Was A Communist and I'm A Christian


I was asked if it isn't better to say presidents in general are an unrepentant prideful lot. They certainly tend to be and I am among the first to say political leaders of any stripe generally drink freely and happily from the whore's cup. But in this case I say it is important to be specific. In this case we have to be clear that regardless of any anointing by the NAE or assurances from the Reichskirche to the contrary we are being... swindled. (Some more colorful imagery a la Ezekiel or Jeremiah would be appropriate but I don't want to lose anymore than I probably will.) If Evangelicals were not going whole hog for this president it might be enough to warn of the generic seduction of power. If Christians could maintain the "moral clarity" we had during the Clinton years it might be enough to say, "Tsk tsk, there they go again."

I will concede that it is not just this president that suffers from this. I will allow a generalization: it is the ethos of his administration that sees the public trust of government as a tool of private wealth. It is possessed by a clear and articulated desire to reduce government of every protective function except that which protects the advantage of the privileged. It is a machine as bad as many of the Gilded Age oiled with the blood of the poor and fueled by wealth. (How's that for hyperbole?) And unlike others sedated into apathy, we are not indifferent, we give our blessing, happy to be invited to the dance, giddy that the skinny plain girl would even be asked. They tell us we're special; Pastor Ted goes to Oval Office prayer meetings, Dr. Dobson gets secret phone calls.

It may surprise some to hear, but I like the US. I like many aspects of our political philosophy. One being our acknowledgment of sin as seen in our institutional checks and balances and that, though we sin, "we the people" can create a system where we better and better serve everyone rather than allow the already privileged few to suck the marrow from the lives of the many. Democracy is our ideal -not oligarchy- and as Christians we have the opportunity to speak uniquely and clearly to a government that will never be the church, that should not be a theocracy, that is ruled by the seductive power of evil but, according to our ideals, can be held in check. But what we have now is an administration that has hijacked the language of our faith to get us into bed. What he have now is a cabal of charlatans that know exactly what to say and do so we'll give it up. We have had it before, and we'll have it again, but this does not diminish that right now, this president- this administration- is committing a horrible fraud against the US- making a joke of democracy- and a lot of the church is making him breakfast.

How does Harriet "Best Governor Ever" Miers fit into this? Maybe she's a moment of clarity. Maybe she's the third act of "A Very Special Beverly Hills 90210" where we realize he never loved us, he just used us and we were all too happy to let him. Maybe the call for her withdrawal is a glimmer of self-respect. I'll make it clearer, maybe some of the church realized W Inc. isn't about conservatism or liberalism, it's about pandering to a loyal segment desperate for attention- throwing them a bone, patronizing the gullible to maintain power for the corporate sluts. This time the bone didn't do.

But this hasn't opened the president's eyes. The looming indictments, the myriad high level ethics and criminal investigations, the increasing number of political failures aren't leading to a denouement where the president and his ilk change their ways. That was the point of the last post. No repentance, no shame. Maybe that's expected, and like I said, not unique to this president. I just highlighted it because of our whorish devotion as the church to this administration- that's the point.

What will we do? Not much is my guess.

1 comment:

Paddy O said...

This is going to sound trollish, but it's not as much, as I am genuinely asking rather than trying to make an opposing point.

Is a post such as this necessarily more Christian than the words of Christians who "get into bed" with the President?

What then do we do with Rom.13:1ff and 1Peter 2:13ff.? These verses were why the attacks on the Clintons from Christians were so appalling to me, and that was an administration so caught up in obfuscation and obstruction much of it wasn't even newsworthy anymore.

It also seems to me that Bush, agree with him or not, is genuinely a Christian, even his political enemies say this is a man who prays and reads the Bible and whatnot. How he acts out his faith in the context of his position is certainly worth a debate, however I wonder if any of us could be in a position such as that without risking some side or another attacking us.

Somehow, the political debate isn't just about policy distinctions. If we disagree we demonize. If we agree we rationalize. Bush didn't just make a bad policy decision in Iraq. HE LIED!! He isn't doing what he thinks is right, even if others disagree. HE'S PART OF A CABAL TO DESTROY DEMOCRACY!!!

My suspicion is that a good portion of the Church likes Bush because he is very much like a good portion of the Church. If he wasn't President he likely would fit in extremely well in any evangelical congregation, and I suspect that a good many Evangelicals would make many similar decisions as Bush.

With this is the core issue of determining his motives. Some assume nefarious motives and see only a deceptive darkness. Others see noble motives and understand the pursuit of progress entails grey areas at times.

How we see this then colors everything else. Do you focus on the 2000 deaths this week or the newly voted in Constitution? Do we see the progress or only the struggle? We tell our own narrative of current events based on what can only be considered personal opinions about particular people. This then snowballs so the opposite side is blind and obscene, rather than just disagreeing.

Only God and GWB know the fullness of the Truth about his motives. It seems Christian to give the benefit of the doubt, and at least have the same sort of respect the Early Church showed for their rulers who were decisively and entirely worse than any Republican administration.

What we should do, IMHO, is pray for our leaders not demonize them, trusting God will answer the prayers and bring light to this world.

Obviously, I have a differing opinion about the motives of this President, but this is something I said during Clinton's Presidency as well, only there weren't any blogs at that time to boldly assert my opinion without anyone asking for it.